Good
- Learned something.
- Mercurial, very useful yet simple. Can apply straight away.
- Practical at end seemed useful way of tieing everything together.
- Doing things in synch with lecturers.
- Scientific approach to programming.
- Whole approach.
- Good overview of the key concepts and foundation to learn more.
- Focussed.
- Course as a whole is good.
- Thorough - basic to advanced - and see new ways to do basics.
- Good practice, can take forward.
- Best practice.
- Really good overview and intro to things not heard of before but would be very useful (version control, MDAnalysis).
- Make and use for things other than C.
- Other instructors chipping in on current instructor was good.
- Loved it, especially version control and make.
|
Bad
- Keeping up with the instructors typing on the projectors, so slow the pace.
- Resources and case-studies from the simple examples to complex examples.
- Would like more of a chance to apply what was learned with the instructors around, or at least feedback on a plan.
- Most sessions ran over.
- Problems with later aspects of Python.
- Balance between beginner and advanced - always wasting someones time.
- Knowing simpler Python commands might've helped beforehand.
- Sometimes a bit too fast.
- More time for exercises.
- Target the course a bit more to their area.
- Helps to start with, but good to have more courses and more on each area.
- More time to work on problems and work through case-studies.
- Downloading all the files for every exercise.
- Days away from work.
|
